Gentlemen of the prosecution team.
We were under the impression that when the articles of impeachment, ALL 8 OF THEM, were filed and delivered to the Senate, you were prepared to show that ALL THESE 8 ALLEGATIONS hold ground, and that you can show that ALL 8 OF THEM can be proven. Your team is composed of eleven (11!) lawyers/prosecutors, 11 lawyers for 8 articles of impeachment. We don’t even want to know how many staff each lawyer has working for them in this case. You are using taxpayers money, our money! Least you can do is come to class with your assignments, yes? Ok, we had our laugh, thank you, now can we get serious please?
Ok, now to OTHER things that happened on day 2 before they decided to humor us.
– Presiding Officer JP Enrile delivered the longest NO in the history of NO, when he denied the motion to subpoena CJ Corona and his family members. It was so long and confusing, the prosecution team merely said “YES” and did not object anymore.
– Sen. Alan Cayetano argued against it, so it was put to vote. 14-6, the Senator-judges voted to uphold the original ruling of NO subpoenas. I think Sen. Lapid raised his hand on both AYEs and NAYs.
– After that was settled, Tupas took the floor to state his objection to Enrile’s comment that the impeachment was “akin to a criminal case.” Why Tupas ever thought he can successfully argue with Enrile will remain a mystery, but he did, and so Manong Johnny delivered another lecture.
– But Tupas was not done yet. He felt that he has not been humiliated enough, and so asked Enrile what is the source of the material he just discussed. To which, brilliant as he is, Enrile replied without missing a beat: “This is the product of my own mind.”
– Cavite Rep. Pidi Barzaga then started presenting evidences for Article 2, and this is when the excrement hit the ventilation. Atty. Cuevas of the defense team insisted that they were not informed that they would start with Article 2, and said the prosecution should follow the order that the Articles were presented. Barzaga, deciding that he can up the ante on self-humiliation, admitted they were not prepared for Article 1, and was convinced by Enrile into admitting that they would prefer a postponement. To which, the taxpayer expressed their collective feeling, as exemplified below:
Sabi niyo …